Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 23:43

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The High Stakes of Kevin Durant’s Closing Act - The Ringer
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Switch 2 quietly makes shiny hunting in Pokémon Scarlet and Violet way better - Polygon
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is the problem between Turkey and Greece?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Liam Coen: Defensive coaches asking for more of Travis Hunter - NBC Sports